You still editing git history to be only contributor while closing users' pull requests is really bad idea.

@appleboy Who did a PR which actually used inside Iris, except me ? saw me the code please,

I hope I will be not the only contribution for a long time more but I'm so far, what's the problem exactly?

I'm getting very good messages every day from the Go Community, how I manage my project is up to me I think, So far I didn't disappointed the iris users

@kataras damn, do you really can't understand that you have huge community and only reasons of I develop iris for more than 7 months alone are that you're closing PRs, editing git history, editing issues and comments and removing third-party licenses? there is NO another reasons. and You saw some old PRs from version 1 when iris was based onnet/http , (iris is v4 based on fasthtttp), none of the (3) PRS with less than 5 lines of code exists in the project is NEVER be a reason to remove commit author from git history. and we all using git every day and we still smart enough to see that you editing git history and it can't be a local issues with my git.

kataras/iris#56
kataras/iris#33
kataras/iris#29
kataras/iris#28
kataras/iris#8
kataras/iris#11
kataras/iris#12

But only one contributor in https://github.com/kataras/iris/graphs/contributors page.

Really? I'm locked that conversation because it was merged and all discussion needs a new issue or PR. what you can say about, for example, kataras/iris#219 and kataras/iris#230?
also I did used iris before. than I got a panic inside, start looking in issues and I saw that issues. it really means that you do not respect contributors and iris' users. and it isn't awesome. you've ignored the licenses twice and it means that you did it specially.

even if the code isn't there, git history will stay with their names and commits, not yours.

@kataras I've sent that PR because this commit: kataras/iris@5c98c5a#diff-9879d6db96fd29134fc802214163b95aL23 basically removed those third-party licenses (again).
Also from the Github history it shows that some people did manage to get their PRs merged but you still denied them the contribution on how the project by flattening the history and not naming them.
Just disable the PRs section if you don't want people to send PRs to any of your projects.
But given how you conduct yourself here, it seems I was right about the project leadership.

I truly am sorry that for all the efforts you are putting in the project you cannot understand simple, basic, requirements. And this time around you cannot blame English on this, like it happened last time.

@kataras I saw the f*... LICENSE and I saw these names WAS NOT inside and of course I didn't because you've added it only 17 hours ago.

awesome. @kataras is now @geramaro. fukken awesome.

@kirillDanshin I think that's the point, he will not play by the rules unless he's called upon. The article he's referring to seems to have been read by a few people and it seems he would do anything to have a good image / stars on Github but otherwise wouldn't care.

From my point of view I think that we've just witnessed how the ecosystem was just broken by the latest rename of @kataras -> to @geramaro and this makes it too unstable to be used in any public usage.

@kirillDanshin if he cannot use a nice language, please don't go down to his level. Thank you.

he almost fuck'd up a huge number of applications with their rename. he's back again.

@kirillDanshin Please lock up the conversation, this is going nowhere, fast.

and I would not be called names. If you can't have the decency to have a normal dialog, them I'm out.

yep, we're all saw this. thanks, iris now banned. good bye, @kataras.
@appleboy, @dlsniper thanks.